 |
| You are not authorized to post a reply.
|
|
| Author |
Messages |
|
Sue K  Posts:8672
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/14/2009 7:08 PM |
|
I'm aware, Semper Fi and always a marine; a good friend of mine is also a marine, and we owe you guys a lot; sorry on the "ex"! BTW, I've made no recommedations to Grant re appropriate block amounts to meet his needs. |
|
sue
Lost 100 lbs 14 yrs ago, off BP meds, thanks to the Zone diet and Zone fish oil!
To view my before/after pics and meal photos scroll over this picture and click when the link appears.
 |
|
|
Grant  Posts:6
 Newbie
 |
| 04/14/2009 7:35 PM |
|
LoL Ooh-Rah... I was in the Corps too Matt.
Sue, I read Matt's (whiteknuckle) posts, but as Matthew mention he was one of many Zone followers who were overweight, began to Zone diet and exercise, then saw dramatic improvements in their fitness and body comp. I also didn't find any of his posts where he specifically mentioned actual LBM gains/BF losses or CrossFit benchmark improvements. The last two I read were in July, 2008 when he was ramping up his intakes/blocks to prep for CrossFit then in August, 2008 when he did his first three WOD's. Can you post some links? He has posted a ton of replies so I'm struggling to fish out his personal testimonies.
I feel like I'm being asked to "take a leap of faith" when it comes to starting Zone. I was drawn to Zone because I have been experiencing significant weight loss over the past few weeks and needed a way to monitor my nutrition and ensure its adequacy. I had been getting fewer than 2,000cal/day eating Paleo with subsequent drops in energy and performance levels. Last week I ramped up my intakes to 2,500cal/day and have been feeling great. My idea was to use Paleo to tell me WHAT to eat and Zone to tell me HOW MUCH to eat. I grabbed a copy of "Mastering the Zone" to begin my journey only to find that on the Zone recommended blocks my intakes would remain roughly the same as before. The same intakes (albeit eyeballed, not accurately measured) that have made me hit the wall in recent weeks. This is why I'm so concerned and looking for some hard evidence. I can't take another lousy month in the gym or in the office, but I want to optimize my nutrition and steer away from eating calories for the sake of getting calories.
Thanks to everyone involved in this discussion thus far!
|
|
|
|
|
Sue K  Posts:8672
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/14/2009 8:02 PM |
|
Grant, I'm not finding what I was referring to either, but this thread contains a post by Matt about some modifications Crossfitters do with diet, in case it might be of any help: http://www.zonediet.com/Community/Forums/tabid/121/view/topic/forumid/2/postid/36171/Default.aspx Last I heard, Matt was doing certification to become a Crossfit trainer. |
|
sue
Lost 100 lbs 14 yrs ago, off BP meds, thanks to the Zone diet and Zone fish oil!
To view my before/after pics and meal photos scroll over this picture and click when the link appears.
 |
|
|
Matthew  Posts:174
 Zoner

 |
| 04/14/2009 8:19 PM |
|
Sue:
No offense take at all regarding the "ex" and thank you for the kudos.
As far as not making any recommendations, I understand that you have not. But it could be implied from Grant's original post (and your response and our discussion following it) that you were suggesting that a significant amount of muscle could be built using a calorie restrictive Zone diet for someone who is already fairly lean. If that is not what you are saying, then I apologize, but that was the impression that I was certainly getting from your statements about calories not mattering, but rather hormones being what mattered (and when put in context, Grant was discussing concerns about gaining muscle and having enough energy for his job based on an iteration of the Zone diet providing him with only 1,800-1,900 calories per day).
My entire point is that quantity AND quality matter. This is true whether your ultimate goal is to lose body fat, gain muscle, do both, or simply maintain. For example, I could eat a Zone diet with the correct protein and carb ratios but consume 10x the amount of fat blocks. I would be "in the Zone" and my hormones might be primed and inflammation at an all time low, but if my goal were to lose fat, that quantity of food I am consuming would cause the opposite to occur. By the same token, if I ate only 1x fat blocks and I'm already lean and I am trying to add muscle and I have fairly high activity levels, no matter how high the quality of what I am eating from a hormonal and inflammation perspective, I am simply not eating enough calories to provide the energy to accomplish my goals.
Now, I am not as strong an adherent to the Zone a you, as you know. I use it as a "base" from which I deviate to the point where some here have pointed out that I am not really doing the Zone any more. My deviations (like eating more blocks and eating non-Zone balanced meals) might be a legitimate source of discussion and debate. But the concept that someone should eat the correct quantity of food (read calories) in addition to the correct quality seems to not be in debate, unless I am mistaken.
Indeed, in another thread I mistakenly thought that you were critical of my suggestion about athletes eating high GI carb + protein meals during the period of time immediately pre-workout through post-workout. Then you pointed out that you were not being critical of me for that suggestion and linked to an article on this website about Zone-sponsored athletes doing exactly that. So, perhaps this is another thread where I am mistakenly perceiving a disagreement where none actually exists.
So, from what I can gather, our disagreements are about whether:
1. It is ever proper to calculate your blocks based on getting protein in excess of 1g/lb 2. Soy as a healthy protein source 3. Saturated fat from sources like coconut oil as a healthy fat source 4. Whether a calorie of fat generates more ATP than a calorie from a carbohydrate source
But apparently we are not in disagreement about the total calorie issue and the workout nutrition issue for athletes.
Grant:
SEMPER FI, TEUFFEL HUND!!
Glad this discussion was helpful to you.
BTW, if your body is hitting a wall on roughly 2,000 calories, but you have more energy and are making progress when you consume 2,500 calories, that right there should tell you something. Your energy levels are such that 2,000 calories, regardless of the quality of the food you are consuming, is just not enough to meet your expenditures. Usually, as with most things, I find making small incremental changes the best way to find out what is best. Maybe for the next month, you try to get 2,800 calories. Measure your progress. If you aren't gaining much muscle, maybe the next month, add another 200-300 calories. Keep doing that until you find what is the right amount for you to meet your goals. By the same token, if you find yourself gaining unwanted body fat in addition to the muscle, perhaps it is time to back off a bit on the calories -- nothing radical, just 200-300 calories. By moving in small increments, giving it time to work and observing the results, you can find through minor adjustments what works for you and what you need to meet your particular goals. |
|
|
|
|
Cranberrycat  Posts:5313
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/14/2009 11:25 PM |
|
I was trying to stay out of this discussion, but I can't help myself! In Grant's case, I would see no problem with him consuming protein to meet his needs. If he finds that he is losing LBM in the Zone, then he SHOULD increase protein intake. For someone who is interested in buidling more muscle mass, then close attention would have to be paid with regard to protein requirements. I don't really care what the Zone recommendations are, that is all based on a scientific formula, but I have also seen it discussed that this formula doesn't work well for people who are "extremes" (elite athletes, severely obese, or very petite individuals, to name a few). I am still sitting on the fence regarding the ATP issue. I would love to read more about it. Matt, I know you posted more about it in that other thread, but I am thinking it may be useful again here. |
|
Cranberrycat
We don't own the earth; we borrow it from our children.
|
|
|
Sue K  Posts:8672
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/15/2009 8:07 AM |
|
<div class='NTForums_Quote'>Posted By Cranberrycat on 04/14/2009 11:25 PM I don't really care what the Zone recommendations are, that is all based on a scientific formula, but I have also seen it discussed that this formula doesn't work well for people who are "extremes" (elite athletes, severely obese, or very petite individuals, to name a few). </div> Hi Cran! I'm confused by this statement because, though I've heard you take issue before with the body fat and LBM results from the calculator on this site, you've always been a proponent of eating within Zone recommendations, at least according to your postings in these forums. 2 questions re your quote above: 1. Are you referring to the body fat calculator or to the idea of graduated amounts of protein depending upon one's LBM and activity level? 2. Do you agree with those who are are in favor of eating 1.5 grams of protein per pound of LBM, and if yes, how would you propose that an individual eating in that manner maintain hormonal control and anti-inflammatory benefits similar to those of the Zone? (They wouldn't be in the Zone, so eicosanoid balance would go right out the window!) Thanks! |
|
sue
Lost 100 lbs 14 yrs ago, off BP meds, thanks to the Zone diet and Zone fish oil!
To view my before/after pics and meal photos scroll over this picture and click when the link appears.
 |
|
|
Cranberrycat  Posts:5313
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/15/2009 12:35 PM |
|
Sue, I believe you are misinterpreting my post. I am a proponent for following Zone guidelines, yes. But, I was referring specifically to the inaccuracies of the bodyfat calculator and its ability to predict everyone's protein needs. If it is telling me to eat a certain number of blocks of protein, and yet I am losing LBM, I would think it is appropriate to increase my protein blocks, even though this technically goes against the Zone guidelines (based on the results of the bodyfat calculator). Hopefully that explanation answers your first question. To answer your second question, I am in favor of those who choose to monitor their own LBM and bodyfat for changes. If one is not achieving their goal in terms of LBM, then one should adjust their protein amounts (and obviously, one should also be performing at that level). That is not necessarily the same thing as blankly stating that everyone should eat 1.5g of protein per pound of LBM. It is more of an individualized approach. Speaking of hormonal control and eicosanoid balance, I just don't completely agree that everything comes down to a mathematical formula. So, I think that those who are not achieving their LBM goals are probably not in the Zone, anyway, so for them, it is maybe more important for eicosanoid balance and hormonal control to increase the protein requirement beyond the zone calculator recommendation, and then follow that with the appropriate carb/fat balance. Of course, that leads us to the debate over whether or not it is appropriate to "overcarb" after a workout (which is what PL Matt is doing, to purposefully elevate insulin levels to aid in recovery of muscle fibers and build more muscle mass). I don't recall hearing your take on that at all, except for the link to that article. I have gotten mixed vibes from you, on where you stand on that issue. BTW, I need to give credit to Karen for abbreviating the Matt's so that we can keep them straight. PL Matt is "power-lifter" Matthew, and CF Matt is "cross-fitter Matt". |
|
Cranberrycat
We don't own the earth; we borrow it from our children.
|
|
|
Cranberrycat  Posts:5313
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/15/2009 4:27 PM |
|
Sue, You said on the last post: "It does not go against Zone guidelines to increase your protein intake if you are losing LBM. Increasing protein intake is precisely what Zone guidelines state to do when one is consistently losing LBM." and You said on the previous post: "Do you agree with those who are are in favor of eating 1.5 grams of protein per pound of LBM, and if yes, how would you propose that an individual eating in that manner maintain hormonal control and anti-inflammatory benefits similar to those of the Zone? (They wouldn't be in the Zone, so eicosanoid balance would go right out the window!)" So, which one is it? Is it OK, or isn't it? --My comments are meant to explain why I don't completely trust the zone bodyfat calculator to predict protein requirements. You seem to feel that it is not appropriate to increase protein to 1.5g/lb of LBM, and my explanation is to show why I feel that it may be necessary at times, based on individual response. Perhaps we are not quite connecting with each other, but your post seems to indicate that, on one hand it is NOT OK to increase protein beyond this, because it is your feeling that eicosanoid status and inflammation levels are affected. But, now you are confusing everyone with your more recent post, because it is basically saying something different regarding increasing protein. I didn't say anything about YOUR post mentioning carb loading. I think that carb loading is probably another area in which you and PL Matt may want to discuss, because this DOES have to do with eicosanoid balance and control of inflammation levels. |
|
Cranberrycat
We don't own the earth; we borrow it from our children.
|
|
|
Matthew  Posts:174
 Zoner

 |
| 04/15/2009 6:43 PM |
|
Let me see if I can supply what my understanding of what Sue is saying (and she can correct me if I am misrepresenting her position).
1. Protein intake can be increased based on activity level, but only up to a point, and that point is 1.0 g/lb. of lbm because eating more than that has negative consequences. 2. Because carbs and fat are supposed to be consumed based on a ratio calculated off of your protein consumption, as protein increases, so too does fat and carbs. 3. Once you hit the ceiling of 1 g/lb. of LBM, if your energy requirements are still not being met, you increase fat consumption only (although you can increase fat consumption to meet energy needs before you get to 1.0 g of protein/lb of lbm).
Is this a fair summary of your position Sue?
As far as Sue's position on carb loading for athletes pre- through post-workout (well, to be more specific, carb + protein loading) I am not entirely sure I know where she stands on the subject, but she has indicated that she acknowledges that Zone athletes do it.
Also, I am not sure 100% that Sue agrees with me that whether we talk about calories or ATP we are really talking about the same thing (in fact, in response to your suggestion, CC, I started a thread about this subject). Basically, the amount of calories food has is just a short-hand for the amount of ATP that can be generated from that food (well, this is true with carbs and fat at least, it gets more complicated with protein, from what I understand). |
|
|
|
|
Cranberrycat  Posts:5313
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/15/2009 7:12 PM |
|
Matt (did you notice that Karen and I have nicknamed you PL Matt, for "power-lifter"): Your points 1-3 sound like what I would assume is Sue's position. Will see when she posts. I guess I am not totally clear on how she feels about that protein adjustment. One of her posts indicated that going up to 1.5g/# LBM was not going to work re: zone guidelines due to eicosanoid status and inflammation. However, then her other post indicated that it would be acceptable to increase protein beyond 1g/# LBM (although she really didn't specify how high she felt was OK to go). And, although she had posted acknowledgement of carb loading among Zone athletes, I think it would be interesting to hear her opinion on it, and whether or not this carb loading keeps one in the Zone. this is probably not related so much to Grant's original question, but thought it would be good conversation. |
|
Cranberrycat
We don't own the earth; we borrow it from our children.
|
|
|
Cranberrycat  Posts:5313
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/15/2009 7:16 PM |
|
BTW, SUE: Although there is no rule that specifies it, I feel it is highly unethical to delete a post after someone has replied to it. I see that you have deleted your reply to me, between my two earlier posts. You had asked me to clarify some things that I had posted about. Deleting a post after someone has posted a reply destroys the integrity of the thread. And, it has now become a waste of my time to have posted a reply to you, if you had felt that your post was no longer important! |
|
Cranberrycat
We don't own the earth; we borrow it from our children.
|
|
|
Matthew  Posts:174
 Zoner

 |
| 04/15/2009 7:28 PM |
|
I did notice the "PL Matt" moniker that I have now acquired. I was hoping for "Sexy Matt" but I guess "PL Matt" will have to do.
:p |
|
|
|
|
sue  Posts:263
 Zoner
 |
| 04/15/2009 7:37 PM |
|
Sue/CC/Matt - i've been following this thread with interest and I just came back to see how things were going. I too noticed that a post was deleted and made the thread very confusing. I had read it before the delete and it made sense and I could see how there was a bit of confusion on each others positions, now it doesn't make sense. This will not be good for newbies.
Matt - we can change that so Sexy Matt if you'd like. |
|
sue
I don't know about the future, but I know who holds the future.... |
|
|
Cranberrycat  Posts:5313
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/15/2009 7:37 PM |
|
| Well, I didn't think my DH would appreciate that one! |
|
Cranberrycat
We don't own the earth; we borrow it from our children.
|
|
|
sue  Posts:263
 Zoner
 |
| 04/15/2009 7:38 PM |
|
CC - we were posting at the same time.  |
|
sue
I don't know about the future, but I know who holds the future.... |
|
|
Cranberrycat  Posts:5313
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/15/2009 7:40 PM |
|
| Thanks, sue--it is disappointing to me when stuff like that happens. We are trying to carry on a really good debate, here. I think Grant even commented earlier that this was very useful for him. Seeing more than one side of things is NOT a bad idea. So, when people come around and play games, posting then deleting, it just doesn't sit well with me. Sorry if I am making a stink about it! |
|
Cranberrycat
We don't own the earth; we borrow it from our children.
|
|
|
sue  Posts:263
 Zoner
 |
| 04/15/2009 9:15 PM |
|
| CC - apology accepted. It kind of ruined my concentration as well, I was following this thread with great interest |
|
sue
I don't know about the future, but I know who holds the future.... |
|
|
Karen  Posts:868
 Zoner
 |
| 04/16/2009 3:26 AM |
|
Me, too, CC and sue! No worries, CC ... it's frustrating. Matt, if we called you Sexy Matt, we'd still be in the same boat ... which Matt are we talking about! LOL! Of course, we could say Sexy PL Matt and Sexy CF Matt! Does that work? Just kidding. We have been talking a lot off line about these discussions (very interesting, BTW) and we needed to come up with how to distinguish which Matt we are talking about. |
|
Happy Zoning! Karen |
|
|
sue  Posts:263
 Zoner
 |
| 04/16/2009 8:07 AM |
|
I did some quick calculations using myself as an example. I put in my exercise as elite and it tells me 15 blocks or approx 1500 cals. i've been told by a personal trainer and others in the traditional medical community that I should not eat less than 1800 cals. So I did what the zone says and because I'm an elite athlete I added extra fat. 1500 cals x 30%=450 cals, at 2x that or 900 cals for a total of 1350 cals of fat. That gets me 2400 cals, so approx to what Matt said for adding muscle. However, when you look at the ratios, that means I'm eating 56% fat, 25% carbs and 19% protein.
That calc should give me the necessary ATP, but I'm not liking the 56% fat bit. I don't believe that ATP is the only thing you need to build muscle. And how in the world do I replace my glucose in my muscles on only 25% carbs?
Can someone explain how it can be healthy to get 56% of your daily requirements from FAT? |
|
sue
I don't know about the future, but I know who holds the future.... |
|
|
Cranberrycat  Posts:5313
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/16/2009 3:05 PM |
|
Karen-LOL! Yes, both Matts are "sexy", so that won't work. Will have to keep the original abbreviations that you came up with! sue-First, if you put your calculations in the calculator, it will tell you what you need to do in order to maintain your LBM. So, if it is saying to get 15 blocks, then that is what you would need to consume to support your LBM. Then, of course, you would consume the necessary amount of carb to go along with the protein. I would assume that the amount of carb that you are getting would be adequate for providing the necessary vitamins and minerals, since it is driven by your measurements and activity factor. Finally, you would consume the necessary amount of fat, which would be 15 blocks in your example. At this point, we are doing everything according to the Zone. I feel that it is important to continue tracking things, and so it would be prudent to recheck these stats periodically to verify changes. One of the concerns is that the elite athlete does not have a lot of fat stores (guess I am pretty lucky with that regard), and so this would be reason to increase the fat block. If one is not maintaining bodyfat%, then one should add fat to the diet. The amount would be dependent on an individual response. Just keep adding fat until fat stores are restored, then level it off at that point (probably easier said than done, you can guess that I haven't personally had to deal with this problem). In terms of muscle, I don't think I would be adding fat to gain muscle. I would recommend adjusting the protein requirement for that, and then the rest of the equation is also adjusted (carbs and fat). In terms of the Zone, I guess I am trying to adjust what applies. I picture an athlete being someone who is NOT carb sensitive, and so he/she probably tolerates a greater amount of carbs. The Zone ratio of protein to carbs is 0.6-1.0. So, an athlete can probably tolerate a protein to carb ratio of 0.6, whereas someone like me is better off near the 1.0 range. the 0.6 ratio is basically the same as someone who "adds" a carb to their blocks, to stay in the Zone. That being said, maybe the way to approach it is not necessarily to add more fat to supply energy needs, but rather to alter the ratio of protein to carb, staying within the Zone but closer to the 0.6 range. Then, add fat if fat stores are depleting. Does this make more sense? took me awhile to write it, had several interruptions, and so I hope I wrote it sensibly! |
|
Cranberrycat
We don't own the earth; we borrow it from our children.
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
|
ActiveForums 3.6
|
|
 |
|
Dr. Barry Sears is a leading authority on the dietary control of hormonal response. A former research scientist at the Boston University School of Medicine and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dr. Sears has dedicated his research efforts over the past 30 years to the study of lipids. He holds 13 U.S. Patents in the areas of intravenous drug delivery systems and hormonal regulation for the treatment of cardiovascular disease.
A turning point in his research occurred in 1982. That year, the Nobel Prize in Medicine was awarded for discoveries of the role that specialized hormones, known as eicosanoids, play in the development of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, auto-immune diseases, and cancer. Since eicosanoids are only generated from dietary fat, Dr. Sears reasoned that one could apply intravenous drug delivery principles to nutrition in order to control these exceptionally powerful hormonal responses with laser-like precision. In essence, his approach treats food as if it were a drug.
This area of his research led to various patents in the area of hormonal control by essentially using food as an oral drug delivery system to modulate eicosanoids especially for cardiovascular, diabetic, and neurological patients.
The impact of Dr. Sears’ revolutionary work in the dietary control of hormonal response began with the publication of his landmark book, The Zone. Since its publication in June 1995, The Zone has sold more than 2,000,000 hardcover copies, and became a #1 best seller on the New York Times book list. In addition, The Zone has been translated into 22 languages indicating a worldwide response to Dr. Sears’ research. His second book, Mastering the Zone, published in 1997, also became a New York Times bestseller with hardcover sales in excess of 500,000 copies to date. His third book, Zone Perfect Meals in Minutes, published in 1997, quickly became one of the best-selling cookbooks of 1997 and an another New York Times bestseller. The Anti-Aging Zone was published in 1999 and provides the molecular insights into how the Zone Diet can reverse the aging process. The Omega Rx Zone, published in 2002, explores the molecular foundation of chronic disease and how high-dose fish oil can dramatically reverse it. His latest book The Anti-Inflammation Zone discusses how to combat silent inflammation in order to reduce the risk of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, dementia, and many other inflammatory conditions—and how to reverse these conditions if they are already present. To date more than 5 million hardcover copies of his Zone books have been sold in the United States.
His research has elevated food from more than simply a source of calories to being recognized as an exceptionally powerful drug. Because of his revolutionary research, Dr. Sears has been a frequent guest on many national programs such as 20/20, Today, Good Morning America, CBS Morning News, CNN, and MSNBC.
Dr. Sears continues his ongoing research as President of Zone Labs, a biotechnology company in Danvers, MA as well as the President of the non-profit Inflammation Research Foundation in Marblehead, MA. In addition to continuing research on the hormonal effects of food, Dr. Sears has expanded his research in developing innovative dietary approaches to treating cancer and neurological conditions, as well as his on-going work in treating cardiovascular diease and type 2 diabetes.
|
|
I have been taking the Fish Oil for over 3 years now. I am 44 playing hockey and working out. The Fish oil helps with the pain that I get from playing hockey. It greatly enhances my performance on the ice and while working out. I have noticed a big difference in my energy, attentiveness and memory. If I miss a day for whatever reason, I notice a huge difference and it feels like something is missing. Anyway that is my short little story and it comes from the heart.
– Carter B.
I am a nutritionist and Ph.D. doctor of health and nutrition. For Dr. Sears to figure out balancing fat, carbs and protein, is really beyond brilliant. It is a milestone in diet history. I go over people's diet/emotional journals. Mostly all the time, we discover that the fatigue, irritability, unstable emotions were due to the imbalance in their diet. Using the Zone to balance them out, helps control weight, roller coaster emotions and gives them energy. Dr. Sears is so right when he says food is medicine. He has figured out the most powerful drug combination going, called The Zone.
Best and healthy wishes,
– Elaine W., Ph.D., N.C., M.A.
I have a very exhausting job as a flight attendant. I read the "Omega Rx Zone" about 4 years ago and started taking the fish oil. I am 47 and have been flying for 22 years. I am very active, I run and lift weights. But combining lack of regular sleep, a physically demanding job, and irregular eating patterns this job takes a toll on the body. Since taking the fish oil, I have noticed that I do not get exhausted. I get tired, but not exhausted. I stopped taking it for a couple of months and then started taking another company's fish oil. I started getting exhausted again. I came back to Zone Labs and will continue with the fish oil for the rest of my life. I believe in the product and it makes a huge difference in my life. It makes a difference with my running as well. I also bring the bars and shakes with me on the road. It is almost impossible to eat the way I should at work. I haven't found the right secret. At least I have my Zone fish oil, bars, and shakes.
– Kathryn S.
I have been in the Zone, for about 1 month now. I wanted to share with you how wonderful I think this program is. I have been a personal trainer for almost 10 years and actively compete in numerous athletic activities. The Zone program has helped me to achieve a better awareness of my nutritional needs and the results I have seen are amazing! I have lost nearly 13 lbs since I have been in the Zone. I feel more mentally alert, more focused at work, have greater intensity during my training, have made significant strength gains, and just feel better over all. With that said, I would like to thank you for helping me in my quest for "super-health"!
Thank you!
– Rob Y.
I read 'The Zone' and as exactly as I could followed the advice for diet. I noted weight loss progress. Over six months, I lost 33 pounds. One year has passed since then. I have maintained the new weight, guided always by Zone concepts. The Zone is powerful - I have found it fantastic and I am very grateful to Dr Sears.
– Lyn S.
Before I stumbled across the Zone I was weighing close to two hundred pounds and I was depressed. I used to be a gymnast as a young man. I would think, "look at me now," when I looked in a mirror. The day I found 'The Zone' book, I was intrigued and as I read it the science made sense and so, I began to follow the "treatment". I began to lose weight and I was feeling way more energetic. I am forty two years old, I am very active and my weight is down to 162 lbs, 38 pounds lost on the Zone. I cycle, walk, jog, swim and I can now perform some of the more simple gymnastic skills I did twenty years ago...I literally feel like I have turned back the clock.
Thank you!
– Jack J.
I have been on the Zone diet for 7 years. I did not go on the diet to lose weight necessarily; but fairly quickly I lost 25 pounds, going from 190 to 165; from a 36-inch waist to a 32-inch waist. I primarily did the Zone to live healthier. My health is excellent now. I just turned 62 years old. My Zone is my eating lifestyle now; I seldom stray; and I do not miss anything. It is The Good Life.
– Curtis Y.
My wife's doctor told her to read "Enter the Zone" and to do the diet, so I told her I would do it with her. After only one week on the plan we went on a strenuous hike (the first of the year), and when we stopped at our favorite coffee shop on the way home I was able to get out of the car and stand upright and walk into the place without pain or stiffness. The Zone had eliminated all the inflammation that had always forced me to stumble all humped over into the coffee shop any time we skied or hiked all day.
Thank you, Doctor Sears.
– Larry C.
I used to have a lot of knee pain when I walked or ran. I have been taking Omega Rx for almost a year now, and rarely have any pain. I believe it is the anti-inflammation action of the oil. I feel smarter as well. Thanks for developing such a superior oil!
– Joe W.
Prior to following the Zone Diet, my body fat was around 15% and my weight around 153 pounds. No matter what I did, my weight and body fat did not change much. I regularly cycled 20-30 hours per week logging well over 400 miles. That had little impact on body fat or weight. Diet also seemed to have little impact on body fat or weight. Within a couple of months of following the zone diet, my weight dropped rather quickly to 142 pounds and body fat to about 8%. I still regularly cycle up to 20 hours per week (during the summer). I have also started strength training. I eat about 16 blocks per day. I take 3.6 grams of fish oil per day, along with Vitamin E, Alpha Lipoic Acid, CoQ10, and B & C vitamins. I also take GLA, which in my opinion, has significantly reduced fatigue and improved recovery times after exercise.
– Jeremy S.
|
|
All polyphenols have antioxidant properties than can be measured by their Oxygen Radical Absorption Capacity (ORAC), but not all polyphenols have anti-inflammatory properties. The polyphenols in Dr. Sears’ Zone Polyphenol Plus have been carefully chosen to have both.
Polyphenols are the phytochemicals that not only give fruits and vegetables their color, but also help regulate inflammation. In addition, polyphenols also activate the key enzyme (AMP kinase) that helps restore cellular ATP levels. Polyphenols also help regulate the activation of inducible inflammatory proteins (such as COX-2 and inflammatory cytokines).
There are more than 4,000 known polyphenols, and the richest sources are fruits and vegetables. In general, the more color a fruit or vegetable has, the richer the polyphenol content.
|
|
Zone Labs’ Ultra Refined Omega-3 Concentrates are three times fresher and contain less than 1/10th the mercury than what is allowed by the Norwegian Medicinal Standard and European Pharmacopoeia Standard
Zone Labs adheres to the International Fish Oil Standard (IFOS), an independent third party validated laboratory quality standard that is more rigid than any other global standard for purity.
- No company in the worlds runs more tests with IFOS than Zone Labs
- Zone Labs receives a 5 out of 5 star IFOS rating for every batch it tests
|
| Standard |
IFOS Standard for a 5-Star Ranking |
Council for Responsible Nutrition |
European Pharmacopeia |
Norwegian Medicinal Standards |
| Peroxide |
< 3.75 meg/kg |
5 meg/kg |
10 meg/kg |
10 meg/kg |
| Totox Levels |
< 20 meg/kg |
26 meg/kg |
NA |
NA |
| Lead |
< 10 ppb |
10 ppb |
100 ppb |
100 ppb |
| Mercury |
< 10 ppb |
10 ppb |
100 ppb |
100 ppb |
| Dioxans and Furans |
< 1 ppt |
2 ppt |
2 ppt |
2 ppt |
| PCBs |
< 45 ppb |
90 ppb |
NA |
NA |
|
|
"IFOS – THE TOP GLOBAL PURITY STANDARD FOR OMEGA-3 FROM FISH"
|
|
 |
 |
|
Zone Labs products show no detectable lead or mercury when tested down to 10ppb, which is 10 times below the Norwegian Medicinal Standard and European Pharmacopoeia Standard limits.
|
Zone Labs products are three times fresher than the minimum allowed by the Norwegian Medicinal Standard and European Pharmacopoeia Standards (based on average peroxide values).
|
Zone Labs starts with only wild, small fish from pristine Chilean waters and ends with proprietary validation and testing processes to achieve an IFOS certified 5 star rating.
8-Step Manufacturing Process - Quality Assured
Testing to specification all raw materials, bulk products, packaging material and finished products – always using stringent internal standards and in-process testing.
- Extraction of fish oil
- Winterization – remove limited amounts of saturated fats
- Absorption – remove heavy metals
- Preliminary Molecular Distillation – refining “touch up” to reduce contaminants
- Oil conversion to ethyl esters
- Ethyl ester thermal fractionation – remove additional saturated fats
- True Molecular Distillation – final refining to remove pcb’s and long-chain monoenes
- Rigid Processes – proprietary validation, inspection and encapsulation methods. Independent lab verification of IFOS requirements and certified 5 star rating
No farmed fish. No large fish. Pristine waters.
Zone Labs starts with wild sardines & anchovies fished from cold, pristine waters off of South America where there are less environmental impurities.
A recommended serving of Zone Labs Ultra-Refined Concentrates delivers 8 times more omega-3’s than a typical retail fish oil supplement.
Most fish oil supplements have 30% or less of the healthy omega-3s EPA and DHA, with the remaining 70% of the capsule containing unbeneficial, lesser refined fatty acids that contribute to their bad taste and gastric side effects.
Getting a clinically valid dose of omega-3’s is easy with Zone Labs’ Ultra-Refined Omega-3 Concentrates.
Typical Retail Dose = 300mg omega-3
Standard Zone Dose = 2400mg omega-3
A serving of canned tuna has 12 times less omega-3’s than
Zone Labs Ultra-Refined Omega-3 Concentrates
|
Commonly consumed fish and shellfish in the United States
Mercury Source: Food and Drug Administration, FDA 1900-2004, “National Marine Fisheries Service Survey of Trace Elements in the Fishery Resource". Omega-3 Level Source: American Heart Association Website.
|
| |
Mercury level
in parts per million (ppm) |
Omega-3 fatty acids
(milligrams per 3-oz. serving) |
| Zone Omega-3 Products |
< 0.01 |
2400 (standard 4 capsule serving |
| Salmon (fresh, frozen) |
0.014 |
1200 |
| Flounder or sole |
0.050 |
480 |
| Pollock |
0.041 |
450 |
| Crab |
0.060 |
400 |
| Scallops |
0.050 |
290 |
| Shrimp |
ND* |
290 |
| Catfish |
0.050 |
270 |
| Clams |
ND* |
250 |
| Cod |
0.095 |
210 |
| Canned Tuna (light) |
0.120 |
200 |
|
Zone Labs’ leading product. OmegaRx delivers all of the benefits of Zone Labs’ ultra-refined omega-3 concentrates.
Advantages
- Delivers clinically proven health benefits from the omega-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA*
- Promotes a healthy heart, healthy brain, healthy immune system, healthy circulatory system, healthy joints, healthy moods, healthy triglyceride levels and a healthy pregnancy*
- Combats silent inflammation
|
Start getting Zone recipes, tips, articles and exclusive promotions sent right to your inbox!
After you provide your email address we’ll send you a confirmation email. You can “opt-out” of this program at anytime by following the simple instructions provided at the end of every email we send you. We will never send too many emails (spam) and we’ll never sell of rent your email to another company.
If you are already registerd with ZoneDiet.com and are receiving emails from Dr. Sears Zone then you do not need to provide your email address to us at this time.
To assure your Zone emails reach your inbox, be sure to add our email address,
reply@zoneliving.com, to your address book.
|
 |