 |
| You are not authorized to post a reply.
|
|
| Author |
Messages |
|
Chris  Posts:14
 Aspiring
 |
| 03/30/2009 7:56 AM |
|
I am new to Zone, 6' tall, 180 lbs, 9% bf. I'm not trying to lose weight, just trying to improve my athletic performance. I do cycling races, running races, etc. I've been on the Zone for about 2 weeks. Anyway I read a lot about people saying the zone does not enough calories... and then I read this post in the CF forum from what seemed to be a respected member: "Each block in the Zone diet is 77 cals (Protein 7gm, Carb 9gm, Fat 1.5) As I understand it, most people will consume 14 or 16 blocks/day. That's only 1232 cals/day. This is enough to maintain (barely) a female, but most males will lose weight on this. Add in a typical 20 min CrossFit WOD @ 20cal/min (which is pretty intense) and that's another 400 calories. It you were to adhere to the Zone diet (or any diet) that provides only 1600 cal and are physically active you will defnitely loose weight. However, you will be very hungry. The Zone is fairly high Carb (46%) so your glycogen stores will be maintained for a few workouts. And then he goes on to say to add calories from another (non zone) source, etc. So my question is, why not just add more blocks? From what I read on this website, I should be around 19 blocks. But for 2 weeks I have been consuming 21 blocks on non-workout days and about 25 blocks on workout days. I've never felt better. Am I not understanding his advice? |
|
33 years, 6', 180 lbs. 9% bf, looking to take performance to the next level in cycling races, running, triathlons, and duathlons. |
|
|
Matthew  Posts:174
 Zoner

 |
| 03/30/2009 9:34 AM |
|
This topic has been precisely what we have recently been discussing on this forum recently.
Broadly speaking, there seem to be three camps of thought:
1. Those that believe the energy requirements for the body can be met through the basic Zone diet.
2. Those that believe that the proper way to handle the increased need for calories is through adding additional fat blocks.
3. Those that think that think the way to deal with the calorie deficit involves a combination of (a) eating non-Zone post workout meals, (b) adding more blocks, and (c) adding more fat blocks.
I am in the third camp. |
|
|
|
|
Chris  Posts:14
 Aspiring
 |
| 03/30/2009 9:48 AM |
|
Thanks for the reply, that sounds like good advice. What I'm currently doing seems to be working. On non-workout days (which is really only 1 or 2 days a week) I'll eat 21 blocks. On heavy workout days I'll have a post-workout shake consisting of 20 grams whey protein isolate, 35 grams Maltodextrin, and trace fat to refuel, then I just continue eating my normal Zone schedule for the rest of the day. On days where I workout twice a day (swimming in the morning, running in the afternoon) I'll just eat breakfast as my morning post-workout, and the shake in the afternoon which is a more intense workout. These workout are normally less than an hour. If I'm feeling sore, or worn down I'll take a shot or two of olive oil. If I'm doing an endurance race, or say a 2+ hour bike ride, I always follow a different fueling plan (I follow Hammer Nutrition's advice) and then just continue following the Zone when I'm done. So in summary, I have a normal daily nutrition plan (the Zone) and a separate intense workout/race nutrition plan. |
|
33 years, 6', 180 lbs. 9% bf, looking to take performance to the next level in cycling races, running, triathlons, and duathlons. |
|
|
Matthew  Posts:174
 Zoner

 |
| 03/30/2009 10:23 AM |
|
Your tweaks to the Zone are very similar to my own. I made changes for several reasons:
1. The calories in the "basic" Zone are FAR below my maintenance levels (around 60% of the calories I need). 2. I do better with more protein than 1g/lb of LBM due to that amount of intense training I do (20+ hours per week). 3. There is plenty of evidence that post workout drinks that are have high GI carbs + protein + BCAAs are very beneficial for those who train intensely. 4. Whatever calories I need that aren't filled by the post w/o meal and extra blocks are filled in with extra fat (I also use EVOO, usually an ounce or two in a glass of low sodium V8 juice). |
|
|
|
|
Kevin  Posts:38
 Aspiring
 |
| 03/30/2009 12:05 PM |
|
I'm not that careful about keeping "within the Zone" with regards to training. I try to meet protein needs, but use a lot more carb than recommended. I tried using balance bars for Sunday 3-4 hour runs and always ran out of energy. I think the protein/carb meters carb absorption, which is good for a diet but bad for training. Instead I use a little Hammergel before the daily workout. The carb gets into the blood fast and used fast. I believe there's no insulin involved. After a run I have the usual zone meal. I run twice daily, before lunch and before dinner.
kevin |
|
|
|
|
Cranberrycat  Posts:5313
 Zone Expert

 |
| 03/30/2009 3:18 PM |
|
Here is a thought about "running out of energy". You were using balance bars. Although "balanced" 40-30-30, the carbs are actually not very low-glycemic. That is why you run out of energy. You are likely spiking glucose and then dropping it like a ton of bricks. Eating lower GL meals/snacks should keep your energy more stable. I really have no idea what hammergel is, but from your description, the same thing is happening, if you are expecting a quick rise in blood glucose, you should also expect a heavy drop in blood glucose (BTW, that is insulin at work in that process). |
|
Cranberrycat
We don't own the earth; we borrow it from our children.
|
|
|
Kevin  Posts:38
 Aspiring
 |
| 03/31/2009 1:09 PM |
|
Hammergel is a liquid used by a lot of runners because it's fast energy, similar to Gu. The label says it doesn't trigger an insulin response. I prefer hammergel also because it comes in small, reusable flasks that fit in the pocket of my running shorts. I can't stand seeing the trail littered with empty Gu packets.
This is the problem I have with Zone. Heavy duty exercise might cause a slight increase in the need for protein but at the same time causes a serious need for more carbs. I've read studies that show with an elevated heart rate glucose enters the muscles without needing insulin's help. Instead, the body used insulin-like growth factor. That's why type-1 diabetics are able to run. The body is always using carb and fat for energy. At low heart rates more fat than carb is used. At high heart rates, more carb than fat is needed.
When you run out of carb, the body goes into gluconeogenesis, making glucose from protein. But it's a slow process and I never found I could run well when depending on food sources other than carb. That's what we call "bonking" or what some call "hitting the wall".
kevin |
|
|
|
|
Cranberrycat  Posts:5313
 Zone Expert

 |
| 03/31/2009 3:23 PM |
|
Have you increased your fat to accommodate for the added energy requirements? FYI, Sue's husband is a runner, maybe she could get in here and post about how to work the Zone in. |
|
Cranberrycat
We don't own the earth; we borrow it from our children.
|
|
|
Sue K  Posts:8674
 Zone Expert

 |
| 04/02/2009 8:50 AM |
|
Chris, this will help you understand better. To quote Barry Sears (pg. 104, The Anti-Inflammation Zone”), “One of the more difficult concepts to get across to athletes, coaches, dieticians, and physicians is the differences between burning calories and producing ATP from calories. ATP is the chemical that is required not only for muscle contraction, but also for virtually all of our metabolism. ATP is made on an as-needed basis from either glucose of fat. Your production of ATP is far greater from a calorie of fat than from a calorie of glucose. In the Anti-Inflammation Zone you are primarily burning fat for ATP production as opposed to glucose. This means you are also making all the ATP you need, even though fewer calories are being expended. This is why diabetics, world-class athletes, or just plain normal people require fat fewer calories on the Zone Diet than calculated from the usual metabolic equations. It is because they are producing more ATP from less calories.” Also, take a look at videos of Dr Sears explaining the Zone diet for athletes at ZoneCompete.com Yes, as Cran said, my husband and our 2 daughters (both in their early 30's) are all marathon runners and do very well using the Zone diet to support their running. There's a marathon runner from Belgium, named Martha, who posts in this forum. She's run marathons all over Europe and is coming to the US to do the NYC Marathon this fall. You might want to look up here posts to read about the improvements she's made to her time since switching to the Zone diet. |
|
sue
Lost 100 lbs 14 yrs ago, off BP meds, thanks to the Zone diet and Zone fish oil!
To view my before/after pics and meal photos scroll over this picture and click when the link appears.
 |
|
|
Matthew  Posts:174
 Zoner

 |
| 04/02/2009 9:43 AM |
|
Sue:
You know, on the "gaining weight" thread someone posted this same information about a calorie of fat producing 3x as much ATP as a carb calorie. The implication was that 1,000 calories of fat that you eat contain 3x the amount of ATP potential as 1,000 calories of carbs that you eat. So I decided to explore this and do some research on the subject. By chance, I happened to come across a biochemistry textbook that had a break down of the amount of ATP/gram (not per calorie) for carbs and fat. A gram of fat can produce 2.49 as much ATP as a gram of carbs. BUT a gram of fat also contains 2.40x as many calories as a carb gram (using the actual number of calories in each, not the approximations of 9 cal/g and 4 cal/g). So, what this means is that the amount of calories is a very very accurate representation of the amount of ATP that can be generated from it (the difference is only 4%).
So, on a calorie per calorie basis (not a gram per gram basis) a calorie of fat produces almost exactly the same amount of ATP as a calorie of a carb. So, for all intents and purposes, you do not make more ATP from a fat rich diet than you do from a carb rich diet.
I'll see if I can find the link to the biochemistry textbook again and link it here.
Also, the greater your intensity, the less you are able to rely on fat as the immediate source of your energy needs because fat can only be metabolized in the presence of oxygen. This is why most your energy requirements when you are at rest come from burning fat, whereas during exercise (or competition) the ratio shifts towards carbohydrates to a greater and greater extent the higher the intensity. When carbohydrates are depleted in the system during exercise or competition, the body is forced to rely on fat to supply the body's energy needs, but the body is not very efficient at doing that at higher intensity levels. This is why marathoners "bonk" during competition -- they deplete the readily available carbohydrates and are forced to rely on the less readily accessible fat stores for their energy needs.
Now, I am by no stretch of the imagination an endurance athlete (yeah right!!), but during competition, endurance athletes need to make sure they are continuing to fill the "gas tank" to perform at their best. Endurance athletes cannot depend on their existing fat stores to provide them the energy they need during competition and still perform at their best because the conversion of fat to ATP during exercise is restricted. |
|
|
|
|
Matthew  Posts:174
 Zoner

 |
| 04/02/2009 11:16 AM |
|
Okay, I couldn't find the exact same biochemistry textbook that I found before, but I found another one that has fairly similar numbers.
It states that complete oxidation of glucose yield 0.21 Moles/g of ATP and complete oxidation of fat yields 0.51 Moles/g of ATP. The ratio between these two numbers is approximately 2.43.
(see Number 5)
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:MNPiV03DUk4J:www.bme.arizona.edu/courses/BME%2520510%2520Problem%2520Set%25207%25202005.pdf+How+many+moles+of+ATP+from+1+gram+of+fat&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
Now, the actual exact number of Cal/g of fat is isn't 9, we round to that number for the sake of ease. It is actually something more like 9.13 Cal/g. And the actual number of Cal/g from a carb is more like 3.83 (I am trying to find a link to this information, but haven't been able to find it again). The ratio between those two numbers is 2.38.
So, while it is true that there is more ATP per gram of fat than there is per gram of carbohydrate, that ratio (2.43) is almost identical to the ratio between Cal/g of fat and carbohydrates (2.38). The difference is only about 2-3%.
Now, from what I have read, it is true that for non-oxidative glycolysis (for example, strenuous exercise lasting between 20 seconds to around 60-90 seconds) that due to the chemical reactions to create glycolysis in the absence of oxygen a lot of the potential energy cannot be converted to ATP and a significant amount is converted into other by-products (I know that lactic acid is one such by-product of non-oxidative glycolysis, but I am sure there are others as well), but I am not sure this really has any bearings on your daily calorie requirements. Also, during non-oxidative glycolysis, my understanding is that your muscles HAVE to use carbohydrate sources for energy because fat can only be burned in the presence of oxygen. So it isn't like you have a choice of using fat to fuel your muscles during periods of intense exertion lasting less than a minute or so, no matter what diet you eat. Also, my understanding is that regardless of what is used to actually fuel the muscles during exertion, and no matter how much potential energy is lost in the process, once the exercise ceases, you have to "repay the oxygen debt" anyways, which means you have to oxidize carbohydrate and fat stores to replace what was lost during exertion. So as best I understand the material I have read, it is 6 of one, 1/2 dozen of the other, in certain respects.
Now, as the intensity of the exercise gets less and less, all the way down to resting, the body is able to oxidize both carbs and fat in the system and as the intensity of gets less, a greater percentage of fat is used for energy requirements (I read in one source that 2/3 of energy requirements when at rest come from fat stores). But as long as we are talking about the amount of energy that can be converted to ATP, for all intents and purposes, a calorie of fat produces the same amount of ATP as a calorie of carbohydrate.
So the bottom line is, a calorie is a calorie (at least for the purposes of ATP yield, not for other purposes). |
|
|
|
|
Matthew  Posts:174
 Zoner

 |
| 04/02/2009 1:30 PM |
|
BTW, I just looked on Wikipedia and it mentioned that carbohydrates are approximately 3.75 calories/gram.
If we use that number instead, we get 9.13/3.75 = ~2.43
And using the ATP approach we get 0.51/0.21 = ~2.43
2.43/2.43 = 1
So the bottom line is that, in the presence of oxygen, your body is able to produce the same amount of ATP per calorie of fat as it can produce per calorie of carbohydrates.
That changes when we burn glycogen without the presence of oxygen (as in during intense exercise lasting less than 60-90 seconds), but under those circumstances, it isn't like you can use fat for fuel anyway because fat cannot be used to produce ATP (like carbohydrates can) without the presence of oxygen. And after intense exercise, the "oxygen debt" has to be repaid anyways, which includes not just getting ATP/CP back into the muscle, getting glycogen back into the muscles, but also converting accumulated lactic acid into pyruvate (which can be used for energy), expending energy to get the body's core temperature back down to normal levels, reoxygenating the blood, reducing the hormone levels to normal, etc.
In fact, the repaying of the oxygen debt is much greater for intense exercise in bouts lasting less than 60 seconds than it is for longer "aerobic" exercises that use fat and carbohydrate sources more efficiently. This is why, even tho aerobic exercise may burn more total calories (during the actual exercise) than a much shorter high intensity interval training session, the HIIT session will burn more fat. The body continues to work pretty hard for a lot longer after the HIIT session is over to get everything back to normal in your body, and to do that, it will be burning fat (in one study, despite burning 1/2 the amount of calories during exercise, the HIIT subjects lost 3x that amount of fat as endurance subjects -- this is probably due to the much longer period of time the body is spend repaying the "oxygen debt"). In addition to being shorter sessions and more efficient for burning fat, HIIT training is a lot more fun to do, anyways... Besides... have you ever seen a fat sprinter? Exactly!! |
|
|
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
|
ActiveForums 3.6
|
|
 |
|
Dr. Barry Sears is a leading authority on the dietary control of hormonal response. A former research scientist at the Boston University School of Medicine and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dr. Sears has dedicated his research efforts over the past 30 years to the study of lipids. He holds 13 U.S. Patents in the areas of intravenous drug delivery systems and hormonal regulation for the treatment of cardiovascular disease.
A turning point in his research occurred in 1982. That year, the Nobel Prize in Medicine was awarded for discoveries of the role that specialized hormones, known as eicosanoids, play in the development of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, auto-immune diseases, and cancer. Since eicosanoids are only generated from dietary fat, Dr. Sears reasoned that one could apply intravenous drug delivery principles to nutrition in order to control these exceptionally powerful hormonal responses with laser-like precision. In essence, his approach treats food as if it were a drug.
This area of his research led to various patents in the area of hormonal control by essentially using food as an oral drug delivery system to modulate eicosanoids especially for cardiovascular, diabetic, and neurological patients.
The impact of Dr. Sears’ revolutionary work in the dietary control of hormonal response began with the publication of his landmark book, The Zone. Since its publication in June 1995, The Zone has sold more than 2,000,000 hardcover copies, and became a #1 best seller on the New York Times book list. In addition, The Zone has been translated into 22 languages indicating a worldwide response to Dr. Sears’ research. His second book, Mastering the Zone, published in 1997, also became a New York Times bestseller with hardcover sales in excess of 500,000 copies to date. His third book, Zone Perfect Meals in Minutes, published in 1997, quickly became one of the best-selling cookbooks of 1997 and an another New York Times bestseller. The Anti-Aging Zone was published in 1999 and provides the molecular insights into how the Zone Diet can reverse the aging process. The Omega Rx Zone, published in 2002, explores the molecular foundation of chronic disease and how high-dose fish oil can dramatically reverse it. His latest book The Anti-Inflammation Zone discusses how to combat silent inflammation in order to reduce the risk of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, dementia, and many other inflammatory conditions—and how to reverse these conditions if they are already present. To date more than 5 million hardcover copies of his Zone books have been sold in the United States.
His research has elevated food from more than simply a source of calories to being recognized as an exceptionally powerful drug. Because of his revolutionary research, Dr. Sears has been a frequent guest on many national programs such as 20/20, Today, Good Morning America, CBS Morning News, CNN, and MSNBC.
Dr. Sears continues his ongoing research as President of Zone Labs, a biotechnology company in Danvers, MA as well as the President of the non-profit Inflammation Research Foundation in Marblehead, MA. In addition to continuing research on the hormonal effects of food, Dr. Sears has expanded his research in developing innovative dietary approaches to treating cancer and neurological conditions, as well as his on-going work in treating cardiovascular diease and type 2 diabetes.
|
|
I have been taking the Fish Oil for over 3 years now. I am 44 playing hockey and working out. The Fish oil helps with the pain that I get from playing hockey. It greatly enhances my performance on the ice and while working out. I have noticed a big difference in my energy, attentiveness and memory. If I miss a day for whatever reason, I notice a huge difference and it feels like something is missing. Anyway that is my short little story and it comes from the heart.
– Carter B.
I am a nutritionist and Ph.D. doctor of health and nutrition. For Dr. Sears to figure out balancing fat, carbs and protein, is really beyond brilliant. It is a milestone in diet history. I go over people's diet/emotional journals. Mostly all the time, we discover that the fatigue, irritability, unstable emotions were due to the imbalance in their diet. Using the Zone to balance them out, helps control weight, roller coaster emotions and gives them energy. Dr. Sears is so right when he says food is medicine. He has figured out the most powerful drug combination going, called The Zone.
Best and healthy wishes,
– Elaine W., Ph.D., N.C., M.A.
I have a very exhausting job as a flight attendant. I read the "Omega Rx Zone" about 4 years ago and started taking the fish oil. I am 47 and have been flying for 22 years. I am very active, I run and lift weights. But combining lack of regular sleep, a physically demanding job, and irregular eating patterns this job takes a toll on the body. Since taking the fish oil, I have noticed that I do not get exhausted. I get tired, but not exhausted. I stopped taking it for a couple of months and then started taking another company's fish oil. I started getting exhausted again. I came back to Zone Labs and will continue with the fish oil for the rest of my life. I believe in the product and it makes a huge difference in my life. It makes a difference with my running as well. I also bring the bars and shakes with me on the road. It is almost impossible to eat the way I should at work. I haven't found the right secret. At least I have my Zone fish oil, bars, and shakes.
– Kathryn S.
I have been in the Zone, for about 1 month now. I wanted to share with you how wonderful I think this program is. I have been a personal trainer for almost 10 years and actively compete in numerous athletic activities. The Zone program has helped me to achieve a better awareness of my nutritional needs and the results I have seen are amazing! I have lost nearly 13 lbs since I have been in the Zone. I feel more mentally alert, more focused at work, have greater intensity during my training, have made significant strength gains, and just feel better over all. With that said, I would like to thank you for helping me in my quest for "super-health"!
Thank you!
– Rob Y.
I read 'The Zone' and as exactly as I could followed the advice for diet. I noted weight loss progress. Over six months, I lost 33 pounds. One year has passed since then. I have maintained the new weight, guided always by Zone concepts. The Zone is powerful - I have found it fantastic and I am very grateful to Dr Sears.
– Lyn S.
Before I stumbled across the Zone I was weighing close to two hundred pounds and I was depressed. I used to be a gymnast as a young man. I would think, "look at me now," when I looked in a mirror. The day I found 'The Zone' book, I was intrigued and as I read it the science made sense and so, I began to follow the "treatment". I began to lose weight and I was feeling way more energetic. I am forty two years old, I am very active and my weight is down to 162 lbs, 38 pounds lost on the Zone. I cycle, walk, jog, swim and I can now perform some of the more simple gymnastic skills I did twenty years ago...I literally feel like I have turned back the clock.
Thank you!
– Jack J.
I have been on the Zone diet for 7 years. I did not go on the diet to lose weight necessarily; but fairly quickly I lost 25 pounds, going from 190 to 165; from a 36-inch waist to a 32-inch waist. I primarily did the Zone to live healthier. My health is excellent now. I just turned 62 years old. My Zone is my eating lifestyle now; I seldom stray; and I do not miss anything. It is The Good Life.
– Curtis Y.
My wife's doctor told her to read "Enter the Zone" and to do the diet, so I told her I would do it with her. After only one week on the plan we went on a strenuous hike (the first of the year), and when we stopped at our favorite coffee shop on the way home I was able to get out of the car and stand upright and walk into the place without pain or stiffness. The Zone had eliminated all the inflammation that had always forced me to stumble all humped over into the coffee shop any time we skied or hiked all day.
Thank you, Doctor Sears.
– Larry C.
I used to have a lot of knee pain when I walked or ran. I have been taking Omega Rx for almost a year now, and rarely have any pain. I believe it is the anti-inflammation action of the oil. I feel smarter as well. Thanks for developing such a superior oil!
– Joe W.
Prior to following the Zone Diet, my body fat was around 15% and my weight around 153 pounds. No matter what I did, my weight and body fat did not change much. I regularly cycled 20-30 hours per week logging well over 400 miles. That had little impact on body fat or weight. Diet also seemed to have little impact on body fat or weight. Within a couple of months of following the zone diet, my weight dropped rather quickly to 142 pounds and body fat to about 8%. I still regularly cycle up to 20 hours per week (during the summer). I have also started strength training. I eat about 16 blocks per day. I take 3.6 grams of fish oil per day, along with Vitamin E, Alpha Lipoic Acid, CoQ10, and B & C vitamins. I also take GLA, which in my opinion, has significantly reduced fatigue and improved recovery times after exercise.
– Jeremy S.
|
|
All polyphenols have antioxidant properties than can be measured by their Oxygen Radical Absorption Capacity (ORAC), but not all polyphenols have anti-inflammatory properties. The polyphenols in Dr. Sears’ Zone Polyphenol Plus have been carefully chosen to have both.
Polyphenols are the phytochemicals that not only give fruits and vegetables their color, but also help regulate inflammation. In addition, polyphenols also activate the key enzyme (AMP kinase) that helps restore cellular ATP levels. Polyphenols also help regulate the activation of inducible inflammatory proteins (such as COX-2 and inflammatory cytokines).
There are more than 4,000 known polyphenols, and the richest sources are fruits and vegetables. In general, the more color a fruit or vegetable has, the richer the polyphenol content.
|
|
Zone Labs’ Ultra Refined Omega-3 Concentrates are three times fresher and contain less than 1/10th the mercury than what is allowed by the Norwegian Medicinal Standard and European Pharmacopoeia Standard
Zone Labs adheres to the International Fish Oil Standard (IFOS), an independent third party validated laboratory quality standard that is more rigid than any other global standard for purity.
- No company in the worlds runs more tests with IFOS than Zone Labs
- Zone Labs receives a 5 out of 5 star IFOS rating for every batch it tests
|
| Standard |
IFOS Standard for a 5-Star Ranking |
Council for Responsible Nutrition |
European Pharmacopeia |
Norwegian Medicinal Standards |
| Peroxide |
< 3.75 meg/kg |
5 meg/kg |
10 meg/kg |
10 meg/kg |
| Totox Levels |
< 20 meg/kg |
26 meg/kg |
NA |
NA |
| Lead |
< 10 ppb |
10 ppb |
100 ppb |
100 ppb |
| Mercury |
< 10 ppb |
10 ppb |
100 ppb |
100 ppb |
| Dioxans and Furans |
< 1 ppt |
2 ppt |
2 ppt |
2 ppt |
| PCBs |
< 45 ppb |
90 ppb |
NA |
NA |
|
|
"IFOS – THE TOP GLOBAL PURITY STANDARD FOR OMEGA-3 FROM FISH"
|
|
 |
 |
|
Zone Labs products show no detectable lead or mercury when tested down to 10ppb, which is 10 times below the Norwegian Medicinal Standard and European Pharmacopoeia Standard limits.
|
Zone Labs products are three times fresher than the minimum allowed by the Norwegian Medicinal Standard and European Pharmacopoeia Standards (based on average peroxide values).
|
Zone Labs starts with only wild, small fish from pristine Chilean waters and ends with proprietary validation and testing processes to achieve an IFOS certified 5 star rating.
8-Step Manufacturing Process - Quality Assured
Testing to specification all raw materials, bulk products, packaging material and finished products – always using stringent internal standards and in-process testing.
- Extraction of fish oil
- Winterization – remove limited amounts of saturated fats
- Absorption – remove heavy metals
- Preliminary Molecular Distillation – refining “touch up” to reduce contaminants
- Oil conversion to ethyl esters
- Ethyl ester thermal fractionation – remove additional saturated fats
- True Molecular Distillation – final refining to remove pcb’s and long-chain monoenes
- Rigid Processes – proprietary validation, inspection and encapsulation methods. Independent lab verification of IFOS requirements and certified 5 star rating
No farmed fish. No large fish. Pristine waters.
Zone Labs starts with wild sardines & anchovies fished from cold, pristine waters off of South America where there are less environmental impurities.
A recommended serving of Zone Labs Ultra-Refined Concentrates delivers 8 times more omega-3’s than a typical retail fish oil supplement.
Most fish oil supplements have 30% or less of the healthy omega-3s EPA and DHA, with the remaining 70% of the capsule containing unbeneficial, lesser refined fatty acids that contribute to their bad taste and gastric side effects.
Getting a clinically valid dose of omega-3’s is easy with Zone Labs’ Ultra-Refined Omega-3 Concentrates.
Typical Retail Dose = 300mg omega-3
Standard Zone Dose = 2400mg omega-3
A serving of canned tuna has 12 times less omega-3’s than
Zone Labs Ultra-Refined Omega-3 Concentrates
|
Commonly consumed fish and shellfish in the United States
Mercury Source: Food and Drug Administration, FDA 1900-2004, “National Marine Fisheries Service Survey of Trace Elements in the Fishery Resource". Omega-3 Level Source: American Heart Association Website.
|
| |
Mercury level
in parts per million (ppm) |
Omega-3 fatty acids
(milligrams per 3-oz. serving) |
| Zone Omega-3 Products |
< 0.01 |
2400 (standard 4 capsule serving |
| Salmon (fresh, frozen) |
0.014 |
1200 |
| Flounder or sole |
0.050 |
480 |
| Pollock |
0.041 |
450 |
| Crab |
0.060 |
400 |
| Scallops |
0.050 |
290 |
| Shrimp |
ND* |
290 |
| Catfish |
0.050 |
270 |
| Clams |
ND* |
250 |
| Cod |
0.095 |
210 |
| Canned Tuna (light) |
0.120 |
200 |
|
Zone Labs’ leading product. OmegaRx delivers all of the benefits of Zone Labs’ ultra-refined omega-3 concentrates.
Advantages
- Delivers clinically proven health benefits from the omega-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA*
- Promotes a healthy heart, healthy brain, healthy immune system, healthy circulatory system, healthy joints, healthy moods, healthy triglyceride levels and a healthy pregnancy*
- Combats silent inflammation
|
Start getting Zone recipes, tips, articles and exclusive promotions sent right to your inbox!
After you provide your email address we’ll send you a confirmation email. You can “opt-out” of this program at anytime by following the simple instructions provided at the end of every email we send you. We will never send too many emails (spam) and we’ll never sell of rent your email to another company.
If you are already registerd with ZoneDiet.com and are receiving emails from Dr. Sears Zone then you do not need to provide your email address to us at this time.
To assure your Zone emails reach your inbox, be sure to add our email address,
reply@zoneliving.com, to your address book.
|
 |